Jump to:

Rilpivirine: second generation NNRTI launched

03 January 2012, 9:10am

A new NNRTI, rilpivirine, has been launched as both a single component tablet, Edurant, and a combination tablet with emtricitabine and tenofovir, Eviplera.

Two rilpivirine-containing products launched: Edurant is a single component tablet and Eviplera is a fixed-dose combination tablet also containing emtricitabine and tenofovir

Two rilpivirine-containing products launched: Edurant is a single component tablet and Eviplera is a fixed-dose combination tablet also containing emtricitabine and tenofovir

Edurant is indicated in combination with other antiretrovirals for treatment-naïve patients with a viral load of 100 000 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml or less. Eviplera, the fixed-dose once-daily combination tablet (rilpivirine, emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil), is licensed for the same indication but as monotherapy.

PHARMACOLOGY

Rilpivirine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) of HIV-1.  It does not affect human cellular DNA polymerases alpha, beta or gamma. Like other second-generation diarylpyrimidine NNRTIs, it has a higher potency, longer half-life and reduced side-effect profile compared with older NNRTIs.1,2

CLINICAL STUDIES

The efficacy and safety of rilpivirine in triple combination therapy was assessed in 2 randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trials using efavirenz as the comparator. In addition to rilpivirine (25mg) or efavirenz (600mg) once daily, patients enrolled in THRIVE (n=678) received tenofovir disoproxil plus emtricitabine, zidovudine plus lamivudine, or abacavir plus lamivudine; participants in ECHO (n=690) all received tenofovir disoproxil plus emtricitabine. The primary endpoint was virologic response, defined as a viral load of less than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml.3,4

Response rates after 48 weeks were comparable for rilpivirine and efavirenz in both THRIVE (86% vs 82%) and ECHO (83% vs 83%), with rilpivirine meeting the criteria for non-inferiority in both cases. Rates of virologic failure were higher with rilpivirine than efavirenz (THRIVE: 7% vs 5%; ECHO: 13% vs 6%). However, there were fewer Grade 2–4 treatment-related adverse events with rilpivirine than efavirenz (16% vs 31% in both studies) and fewer discontinuations due to adverse events (THRIVE: 4% vs 7%; ECHO: 2% vs 8%).3,4

REFERENCES

1.    Edurant Summary of Product Characteristics, November 2011.
2.    Eviplera Summary of Product Characteristics, November 2011.
3.    Cohen CJ et al. Lancet 2011;378:229-37.
4.    Molina JM et al. Lancet 2011;378:238-46.

 

MIMs Drug Search

Possible searches include drugs (by brand, generic ingredient or drug class), diseases and more.

Find drugs by:

Back to top