Giotrif launch provides new option for treatment of advanced lung cancer

Giotrif (afatinib) is indicated for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in patients with activating EGFR mutation(s) who had not previously received treatment with EGFR inhibitors.

Food should not be consumed for at least 3 hours before and at least 1 hour after taking Giotrif (afatinib) for NSCLC (pictured) | SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY
Food should not be consumed for at least 3 hours before and at least 1 hour after taking Giotrif (afatinib) for NSCLC (pictured) | SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY


Afatinib is a ErbB family blocker which binds covalently to and irreversibly blocks signalling from all homo- and hetero-dimers formed by members of the ErbB family, including EGFR, HER2, ErbB3 and ErbB4.1


The efficacy of EGFR genotype-directed therapy with afatinib was compared with cisplatin plus pemetrexed chemotherapy in the LUX-Lung 3 study. The phase III study included 345 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and proven EGFR mutations who were randomised to receive oral afatinib 40mg once daily or intravenous cisplatin 75mg/m2 plus pemetrexed 500mg/m2 once every 21 days up to a maximum of six cycles.2

Tumours were assessed by a CT or MRI scan every six weeks for the first 48 weeks then every 12 weeks until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy.2

Significantly longer survival

At the time of primary analysis (median follow-up of 16.4 months), progression-free survival (as assessed by independent review) was significantly prolonged in the afatinib group compared with the chemotherapy group (11.1 months versus 6.9 months, respectively [hazard ratio 0.58; 95% CI 0.43–0.78; p=0.001]). Similar findings were observed for investigator-assessed progression-free survival.2

A pre-planned analysis of patients with common EGFR mutations (n=308) showed that that the progression-free survival benefit was even greater in this population (median 13.6 months for afatinib versus 6.9 months for chemotherapy [hazard ratio 0.47; 95% CI 0.34–0.65; p=0.001).2

Significantly higher response rates were observed in the afatinib group compared with the chemotherapy group for both independent (56% versus 23%, respectively) and investigator (69% versus 44%, respectively) assessments (p=0.001 for both).2

In addition, time to deterioration of symptoms and clinically meaningful worsening of cough (hazard ratio 0.60; 95% CI 0.41–0.87; p=0.007) and dyspnoea (hazard ratio 0.68; 95% CI 0.50–0.93; p=0.01) was significantly greater in the afatinib group than in the chemotherapy group. Time to deterioration of pain was also longer in the afatinib group but this difference did not reach significance (hazard ratio 0.83; 95% CI 0.62–1.10; p=0.19).2

Diarrhoea and skin reactions

Afatinib was well tolerated with diarrhoea and skin-related reactions the most commonly reported adverse effects.2


  1. Giotrif Summaries of Product Characteristics, September 2013.
  2. Sequist LV et al. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3327–34.

View Giotrif drug record

Further information: Boehringer Ingelheim

Follow MIMS on Twitter

Register or Subscribe to MIMS

GPs can get MIMS print & online and GPonline for free when they register online – take 2 minutes, and make sure you get your free MIMS access! If you're not a GP, you can subscribe to MIMS for full access.

Register or subscribe

MIMS bulletins

News and updates straight to your inbox.

Prescribing Update: Fortnightly news bulletin
Urgent prescribing updates
Spotlight: Disease-themed monthly round-up

Sign me up

MIMS Dermatology

Read the latest issue online exclusively on MIMS Learning.

Read MIMS Dermatology

Mobile apps

MIMS: access the full drug database and quick-reference tables on the go

MIMS Diagnosis and Management: concise information on signs and symptoms, investigations and diseases

Promo Image

Clinical calculators

Handy calculators and conversions for primary care.